Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id LAA00794 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 11:28:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA140963241; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 08:27:21 -0700
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 08:27:21 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <317CF457.40B3@panix.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Angelito So <lito@panix.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Semi-OFFTOPIC: OpenGL cards?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Tim Krego wrote:
>
> At 10:19 PM 4/22/96 -0400, you wrote:
> >With all the talk of Lightwave 5 and open gl... I have been asking
> >around about open GL cards and have found out that even the new ones comming
> >out (like the imagine 128 series 2 w/ 8 megs) will not support open GL at
> >resolutions greater than 800x600.
>
> The Imagine 128 II isn't an OpenGL accelerator. It is in the league of the
> Matrox Millenium.
So does this mean that it will not accelerate Open GL? In other words there is
little to no difference in performance to a non-3D accelerated card?